Wednesday, February 13, 2019

If They Come For Us: Partitions/Blockages of What Could Be, But Never Is

I am enthralled with this book of poetry, and most importantly, I am fascinated with Fatimah Asghar's running theme/title of "Partition." The most obvious moments of partition is the partition of India in 1947, referring to splitting of the country into India and Pakistan. This historical partition acts as the spine of this collection of works, but partition plays out in several moments. The partition of the living and the dead. The partition of America and India. The partition of her from her adopted family, her gender identity (being female but feeling male), but I most interested in the partition of her from her mother and father.

I think its most interesting how Asghar elicits feelings of isolation and longing through describing her orphanage throughout the poems, often employing a series of ethereal and pastoral imagery to reference to her parents, while she remains in the mundane of living a complex life. In "Land Where My Father Died" she writes "[...] says mine land that plants mines & says go back land that poisoned my mother & devoured her body land that makes my other languages strange on my tongue land [...] & the last land that killed my father & then sent back his body land that made me orphan of thee I sing" (55). Here, she appropriates the song "America the Beautiful" to examine the ways in which this country has displaced her connection to her home, to her family, and essentially herself. The "partition" or alienation that she experiences in America is initiated in her separation from her parents. I love the description of the land poisoning her mother and killing her father (and sending him car to his home land), because the repetition of land elicits how ownership of land (through borders, through claiming nature) results in the land itself turning on humanity.

Another poem that I think best describes the partition between her and her parents is the poem called "White Lie" I love how Asghar characterizers herself in her childhood as seemingly innocent throughout the poem, being someone who is unassuming and well-mannered enough to be believed by the adults. The poem hits a grave ending when we realize the lie that she tells about her parents being alive is much more harmful to the construction of her identity. she writes "yes of course they love me. But Boston/has better public schools & I get to se them/every holiday & we go on long drives [...]" (48). I see the revealing of this lie at the end as Asghar's childhood's self coping and mourning they loss of her parents. Her friend tell very atypical lies to their family members, but Asghar's lie is a fantasy of what could be, but never is as a result of her orphanage. This separation from her parents, through their deaths, allows her to creates an entire fantasy about an unimagined reality.



4 comments:

  1. Yes, I love how you point out that one of the deepest partitions running through this work is Asghar's separation from her own parents. This is a partition that is both absolutely personal and definitively political and we are invited to mourn with her for all the echoes of the historical event by getting to know that little girl who continues to pretend to everyone around her that her family still takes her on long drives.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also how many layers of "partition" you've uncovered in the work. That feeling of separateness/severance it's such a colonialist strategy, but it also can become such a deeply internalized state of being.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You really addressed some of the strategies of the collection really well, Mia. I agree with your colleagues that expanding the sense of partition beyond the historical events of 47 (not only personal but 9/11 and other identity moments too) is really a good key into the book
    E

    ReplyDelete
  4. I love what you said about Asghar's many ways of addressing partition " The partition of her from her adopted family, her gender identity (being female but feeling male), but I most interested in the partition of her from her mother and father." I also thought this was extremely effective and interesting. It also made me think of ancestral / intergenerational trauma. Like how if something traumatic (like the Partition in the 1940's) happens in your family, you feel it echoing out in different ways in your day to day life. It's as if you see it's ghost in things that others might perceive as unrelated. Really thoughtful response. Thank you for sharing your ideas!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.