When
reading Registers of Illuminated Villages
by Tarfia Faizullah, I was struck through out the entirety of this collection,
so it is hard to find a place to start, as I feel myself still digesting. But one aspect of this poetry book that
I loved clearly was the structure and how that carried the poems and I think
about the collection of poems that seemed to follow each other, though they
were not positioned next to each other. I thought about what registers are and
they make me think of the human voice, and how the human voice differs and how many
registers one human can have whether born with or trained to have and how
registers in the voice can be lost due to circumstance. I think about registers
of experience for marginalized folks, and how there are many social
intersections that determine snap judgements.
In
this collection Faizullah gave us three poems entitled registers of hunger, registers
of submission and registers of solace. Each one, to me, stuck out like a flower
amongst beautiful thorns. The way the poems are structured, with the
parenthesis as titles to smaller vignettes yet still a part of the larger poem,
is something that I think carried the words with even more ‘umph’. I am drawn
to registers of hunger “(flesh)/ by whittling our false gods from stone” (Faizullah
12). I loved this last line, it was so poignant, but this vein seems to run
through the blood of her collection. An attention to steer away from humans who
we can make into gods but are just human. I believe I even see this vein when
Faizullah speaks about the widowed village, structured in the collection
between black inked pages. There is a truth telling in that section that hit me
hard.
I
was also most struck by the last of the three, registers of solace. What I
loved about this poem was the attention to self in the love section. “(first love)
and first, love, the moment you caught a glimpse of yourself standing in the
long unending plane of a tinted window—then skin, skin, skin, torso, teeth,
wrist, the birds of hair, pierced to heart (first beginnings) cannot be
distinguished by the eye—” (Faizullah 72). There is so much magic in between
these lines, I feel I need a few months to digest. I agree with Faizullah
though, when we start something off right, barely can it be seen properly by those
around us!
I
don’t usually love the last poem in poetry collections, I think sometimes they
can be extraneous, a poem that fits a little too off center from the scatter
plot of the poems. But this last one was also wonderful. I felt like it was a
call to worship the self, to right wrongs and make sense out of darkness using
all of the voices you have ever been given. Faizullah writes “…I know a good
one: a monster named joy-in-the-margins learns the nature of light by revising
the dark into song with every register of her seven tongues. Ready? Let’s
begin. Verse 0. Surah 1” Faizullah 92). This resonated with me because of the
sound of its truth. With every register, with every voice inside of us, we will
turn those dark spaces into light.
I was also drawn to the organizing of the volume with the registers of hunger, submission solace, and astonishment, each giving us a place with more humanity, more depth and space than the rigid registers of death written by the institutions of government or by a society so unfamiliar with responding to, ritualizing, or remembering those who have passed and those left behind.
ReplyDeleteI like your reading of the last poem, "I felt like it was a call to worship the self, to right wrongs and make sense out of darkness using all of the voices you have ever been given." That recognition of all of the selves and past lives we have lived and the recourse all of them are to the pursuit of bettering the world
Thank you for highlighting the poems that begin each section of the collection. Upon the second read, I viewed them as a sort of lens through which to view the poems that followed them. The words in parentheses within the individual poems acted as a sort of header or whispered word of meaning from the poet. An intention played out from her pen that, I agree with you, made the verse that follow them "pop" with meaning, and give them a little more impact than if she had not wrapped them in parentheses and placed them on the page set off from the verses that followed them. How Faizullah places her poems on the page add a layer of depth to them as well. So well-crafted. I loved this collection.
ReplyDeleteDuane,
ReplyDeleteI think this post does a lot to begin discussion of how this collection moves. I also found that these three pieces "stuck out" in a brilliant and beautiful way. I hope we get the opportunity to discuss these poems more in depth in class. I would love to take a deeper look at all three but for now I think your reading of "The Hidden Register of Hunger" is true to how I read it, as a thread of the entire collection. "O, these daily / rituals we believe we are owed. / O, arrogant, tongue-slung," Each word in parentheses is illuminated but her renderings below it. The one about greed struck me hardest and throughout I wondered if Faizullah wasn't talking about some of the violent people who appear throughout the text. Or even just human nature itself.
xoxo,
Rai