Hacha
When
I think Hacha, I think accessibility,
especially when it comes to language and the use of it. And I believe that page
34 with the poem Lisiensan Ga’Lago is
an excellent example of that. There is a key in the middle left hand side of
the page, alerting the reader to what words mean what. That is done for the
reader, but it doesn’t have to be. My take away being the words used to be
purposeful to the culture they came from, and once these words are changed by
violence, then the true root meaning of the word is lost.
I
found this on page 23 too, Perez says “mata’pang” used to mean “proud and brave”
used to mean “alert eyes” – he led the rebellion against the Spanish before he
was captured and killed –
Now it means “silly”
or “rude” or “misbehaved” or “uncivil”
[Achiote was used
to stop bleeding was used as antivenom for snake bites, was used to heal
wounds]” (Perez 23).
What I loved about this passage was the
message. There are whole languages that have been swallowed by the effects of
war and colonization. And with language being a system of knowledge, it seems knowledge
has been lost too with the changing of definitions. We see Perez engage with
this in the brackets at the end of this poem. Perez reveals to us what the
elders in his life knew, that Achiote has medicinal purposes. But because the language
changed, and the definitions, now its benefits are not recognized as truth, not
registered because of colonizer logic. It makes me wonder what other kinds of
knowledges have been lost with the tearing down of language.
I also really loved the spacing in that
poem, it seemed to me to be making room for the weight of the message.
I saw a lot of ecological references
here too. On page 81, Perez says “For two years I ate rice and dirt and sun” (Perez
81). There’s a rhythm here…but also nature found in the body, with the image of
‘eating sun’. And I wonder if one was on a diet of eating the sun, in a
metaphorical sense but maybe even in a mythical sense, what would that do to
one’s body? With the food and nourishment (or non-nourishing) things we put in
our body, what would the sun do?
Through the book though, I also saw
Perez do some work of reclaiming history, so that the victor doesn’t have the
last say after a terrible war and massacre of an entire culture. I also saw
that work in the boxes he provided in some of his poetry that acted as a key. Through
context, through culture, Perez was able to fill in some of the words. But all
of us do not have the tools to decode.
I
also found myself interested in how that box operates in all of our own
personal lives, A key of meaning that has yet to be filled in. Definitions that
may have been lost but can be reclaimed.
It was so hard to choose which poems to talk about. I too loved the poem, "from Achiote" with its parallels drawn between the plant, foreign to Guahan and brought by Spanish colonizers, and Catholicism, foreign to Guahan and brought by Spanish colonizers. The red of the plant mirrors the red blood of father sanvitores in the ocean where it is said he 'resurfaced three times before drowning.' How through colonization both Achiote and Catholicism were subsumed into Chamorro culture, changing the way the Chamorro eat and pray. Changing the language, as colonization does and needs to do in order to desecrate and control a people. Changing the meaning of words like "mata pang," a warrior, a rebel, someone who rejected and fought against colonialism. It is this way that colonialism seeks to alter history by renaming it, so that a hero who is "proud and brave" with "alert eyes" is diminished to "uncivil," "silly," "rude,"or "misbehaved"
ReplyDeleteAccessibility is an interesting place to start. And Perez opens up so many spaces where we can think or sink!
ReplyDeletee